described the core job accurately
Complete20 / 20accepted responses
before seeing extra explanation
said yes rather than maybe/no
from page open to response
01
What the pattern says
Recurring findings across accepted responses.
The core job is understood
14 of 20 participants correctly described decision tracking after meetings.
Product type is unclear
6 participants described the offer as a service or consultancy rather than software.
Proof arrives too late
9 participants wanted to see a real output before granting access to meeting data.
02
What people actually said
Anonymous, lightly edited only for obvious spelling.
“I understand the outcome, but I still cannot picture what I receive after the meeting.”
Participant 04
“It feels useful for a remote team, but I first thought someone would do the analysis manually.”
Participant 11
“Show me one messy meeting turned into a clean decision log and I would try it.”
Participant 18
03
What to change first
Ordered by likely clarity impact, not implementation effort.
- 01
Add an above-the-fold product screenshot labelled “Your decision log”.
- 02
State “self-serve software” directly below the headline.
- 03
Move the privacy explanation and supported meeting tools next to the primary CTA.
Method note
What this report can—and cannot—tell you.
This is a directional comprehension test, not a sales forecast. Participants are paid for accepted attention, never for positive sentiment. Broad profile traits are self-reported in the MVP; narrow professional claims are not guaranteed.